Showing posts with label Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Education. Show all posts
Thursday, 9 November 2017
Musings and Amusings
15:17
Book Review, Bubbles, Debt, Education, Environment, Everyday Money, Finance and Investments, Investing, Money, Small Business, Wealth, Who's counting?
No comments
Manifestoes
for working women, much like working women themselves, are often held to an impossibly
high standard. Sheryl Sandberg’s Lean In
was a best-seller, but critics – male and female – tore it apart because it
asked women alone to fix their broken work environment. The criticism is valid;
Sandberg has since admitted that it would be hard for a single mother to follow
her advice. And yet male-authored advice books hardly get torn apart for
failing to address intersectionality, privilege, and structural racism and
sexism along with tips on how to climb the corporate ladder.
Sallie
Krawcheck wants us to know, even before we open Own It: The Power of Women at Work, that she excels in the face of
such impossible standards – in heels, no less. The cover features Krawcheck,
the co-founder and chief executive officer of Ellevest, an online investment
service for women, perched atop a stepladder in black stilettos. Krawcheck gets
how difficult it is for women to break into the executive class. She worked her
way up in the banking industry, only to be let go from C-suite jobs at
Citigroup and Merrill Lynch.
Reflecting on her tenure at Citigroup, which ended
about nine years ago, she says she believes gender played a major role in the
tensions she experienced. The final straw, Krawcheck writes, came when she made
an unpopular suggestion that she believed was in the company’s best interest:
reimbursing some Citigroup customers for losses they’d suffered in the early
days of the 2008 financial crisis.
Given how
she frames her experiences, you wouldn’t expect Krawcheck to write that “being
a woman in the business world is not a liability: it’s power.” The liability,
she says, manifests primarily when women try to affect a masculine demeanor
around the office: when women speak up, as she did, they’re judged more
negatively than men. Women who negotiate the way men do are considered too
pushy. So throughout the book, Krawcheck scatters tips on how to successfully
leverage feminine traits. In a chapter titled “The Obligatory Ask-for-the-Raise
and How-to-Negotiate Chapter (With a Twist),” she suggests that women pretend
during salary negotiations that they’re at a PTA meeting. Research shows that
women perform better when they’re fighting on behalf of someone else, such as
their kids.
Her
approach makes sense, but does it work? Here, Krawcheck runs into some trouble.
She argues that companies resistant to women-friendly policies and practices
will fail – but they haven’t, even as inhospitality remains the norm. The pay
gap persists. The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission got almost 13,000
complaints of sexual harassment in 2015, a number that’s held steady since
2011. Women enter corporate America at near-parity with men but occupy only 19%
of C-suite positions, according to a recent survey by McKinsey and LeanIn.org.
Sandberg’s nonprofit. In another recent survey, by MWW Public Relations and
Wakefield Research, three-quarters of respondents said they believe women are
worse at delivering financial returns for companies. The opposite is true:
Numerous studies say that organisations with female managers perform better on
average than those led by men. Whatever Krawcheck’s hopes, women tend to get
penalised no matter how they act on their way to the top. Those who get there
are often set up for failure, tapped to lead only in moments of crisis, when
the odds of succeeding are slim to none, a phenomenon known as the glass cliff.
Ultimately,
Krawcheck argues, there may be no way for women to work within the system and
win, no matter how often they transform perceived liabilities into assets. Her
most useful – and radical – advice comes in chapters that urge women to opt
out. In “Literally Own It: Start Your Own Thing,” she encourages women to start
businesses. When that happens, “there’s no playing by the boys’ club rules,”
she writes. “No asking permission.” Since the system isn’t working for us, it’s
time for us to build our own.
Source:
Bloomberg.com
Thursday, 2 November 2017
Womenomics
09:35
Education, Everyday Money, Finance and Investments, Marriage, Musings and Amusings, Rights, Sex, Trends, Wealth
No comments
Why Put a Ring on It?
In America,
women are waiting longer to wed than ever, and many are choosing not to do so
at all. The freedom to pursue high-powered careers and sexually diverse lives
without fear of pregnancy or stigma has turned marriage into a choice, not
destiny. By 2009 nearly half of all American adults younger than 34 had never
married, a rise of 12 percentage points in less than a decade. Unmarried women
outnumber married ones for the first time ever.
Single
women are reshaping politics. As women tend to worry more about reproductive
rights and fair pay, they have favoured Democrats for president since 1988. But
the overall women’s vote hides a divide: in 2012 Mitt Romney narrowly carried
married women, while the unmarried rushed to Barack Obama in their millions, giving
him a 36-point margin. Single women cast almost a quarter of the votes, nearly
guaranteeing his re-election.
Delaying
marriage is also having economic effects: women aged 25 to 34 are the first
generation to start their careers near parity with men, earning 93% of men’s
wages. Single women now buy homes at greater rates than single men, a big step
in independent wealth-building.
These
trends have some conservatives fretting about the decline of the family. The
divorce rate rocketed in the 1970s and 1980s, as women who had rushed into
unhappy marriages discovered they could make their own way. The boom in divorce
encouraged many in the next generation to abstain from marriage rather than
enter a flawed one. Now that marriage is simply one option among many, fewer
women are exchanging vows, but those that do tend to be in happier, more
co-operative relationships.
The divorce
rate, now falling, has plunged fastest among those who stay single longest.
Despite the stereotype that high-achieving women are doomed to spinsterhood,
the truth is that these women are now the most likely to tie the knot, and can
afford to hold out for the right match.
Not all
women are celebrating. For some, singlehood is less a choice than bad luck.
Outside big cities, women who are unmarried into their late 30's are often
pitied. For those who hope to become mothers, biology imposes harsh deadlines –
though breakthroughs in fertility treatments have raised the number of women
giving birth after age 35 by 64% between 1990 and 2008.
In
particular, poor single women face a different landscape. Not all are unmarried
by choice: America’s high incarceration rate has shrunk their pool of men.
Single parenthood is strongly correlated with poverty. Conservatives duly push
marriage as the antidote: the federal government has spent almost a billion
dollars on pro-marriage programmes, to little avail.
Source:
economist.com
Friday, 27 October 2017
Frame and Investment
Women Are Owning More and More Small Businesses
Owning your
own business is often touted as the ultimate coup in the working world. You set
your own hours, pursue projects you’re interested in, and maybe work in your
pajamas.
About 29%
of America’s business owners are women, that’s up from 26% in 1997. The number
of women-owned firms has grown 68% since 2007, compared with 47% for all
businesses.
The
progress for minority women has been particularly swift, with business
ownership skyrocketing by 265% since 1997, the report says. And minorities now
make up one in three female-owned businesses, up from only one in six less than
two decades ago.
Why have
minority women had such an apparent breakthrough in the world of
entrepreneurship? It’s partially a numbers game – in 1997 minority women
represented such a small number of owners – less than one million – that even
moderate growth would have likely helped them outpace the growth of the broader
field of women-owners. But Jessica Milli, a senior research associate at IWPR,
says that the characteristics of minority women who opt to open businesses may
also play a role in the runaway growth.
“Women of
colour are more likely to be younger when they first found their business,”
says Milli. “Given today’s climate – when a lot of purchasing occurs online and
social-media usage can really make or break a business this can mean that those
businesses might have a competitive advantage.”
The growing
prevalence of female entrepreneurs of all races didn’t happen by accident.
Instead, it may be proof that legislation targeted at women and minority
small-business owners are having an effect.
Women
business owners still face a significant wage gap and continually have smaller
amounts of start-up capital than their male peers.
For one,
women-owner businesses make only about 25 cents for every dollar their male
counterparts earn. That’s a much larger gap than the one that exists in the
overall labour market, where the median earnings of women were about 83% of
men’s.
Although
challenges like access to capital and wage equality persist having more women
entrepreneurs may be helpful in and of itself when it comes to boosting the
successfulness of female owners. Researchers who studied the effect of peer
relationships on female entrepreneurs in India found that women who received
business training with a friend were more likely to take out business loans,
and more likely to report higher business activity and household income than
peers who received training without a peer. And though equality on all fronts
is still a long way off, the field of entrepreneurship is “moving toward
equality in terms of representation, which is a great thing,” Milli says.
“Overall, the picture is optimistic.”
Source:
theatlantic.com
Wednesday, 23 January 2008
Why?

There are plenty of theories which claim the rationale but the jury is still out.
Why does this matter?
- It is actually a world wide trend, some US universities are introducing positive discrimination to life male attendance. Should NZ?
- Educated women marry later and have fewer children, what impact will this have on family formation?
- We have, in the past, "married up"; as we outperform men will there be a decline in partnering?
- What will happen to ethnic intermarriage rates given that well educated Maori and Pacific women are far more likely to have a partner outside their ethnic group - does this matter?
I look forward to your comments.