Monday, 16 July 2012
Everyday Money
Struggling to organise joint finances? Try the following:
Source: Girls Just Want to Have Fund$ by Sheryl Sutherland
Musings and Amusings
Evolution has given
humans a huge advantage over most other animals: middle age – who would have
thought?
We are used to dismissing our
fifth and sixth decades as a negative chapter in our lives, perhaps even a
cause for crisis. But recent scientific findings have shown just how important
middle age is for every one of us, and how crucial it has been to the success
of our species. Middle age is not just about wrinkles and worry. It is not
about getting old. It is an ancient, pivotal episode in the human life span,
pre-programmed into us by natural selection, an exceptional characteristic of an
exceptional species.
An important clue that middle age isn’t just the start of a downward spiral is that it does not bear the hallmarks of general, passive decline.
Excellent news for those who were
worrying about the impending doom and gloom of old age.
Source: The Washington Post
Who's counting?
Most New Zealander's would not survive longer than three months in the face
of a personal financial disaster, according to new research.
Visa's 2012 International Financial Literacy Barometer surveyed more than
25,000 people across 28 countries.
New Zealand was ranked the sixth most financially literate country, behind
world leaders Brazil, Mexico and Australia.
Our savings rate was well behind the Chinese, about half of whom have built
up enough of a cash buffer to survive for six months.
However we came out ahead of Pakistan, where just 13-14 per cent of
respondents were able to endure a three-month financial calamity.
One of the key findings of the survey was that earning a high income did not
necessarily translate to good financial health.
For example in Canada, Russia and Serbia high-income earners were less
prepared to weather a crisis than their peers getting by on lower incomes.
The survey also found that New Zealanders were pretty good at following a
household budget, scoring 45.8 out of 100, and at talking to their kids about
money (44.9).
But our lack of faith in young people's ability to understand money
management basics put us near the bottom of the table for that category, in
21st place.
The survey found that the youngest and oldest individuals tended to be most
at risk, with those aged 35-49 in the best financial position.
Source: Richard Meadows, Fairfax
News
Womenomics
Following the lead of countries like Spain, France, Italy, and Belgium, the European
Union is considering legislating quotas for women directors on boards.
Quotas are a drastic step, especially in Europe, where men overwhelmingly
run companies, and boards of directors are also almost entirely male. Just
13.7% of large-company directors and 3.2% of presidents and chairmen within the
EU were women as of January, the New York Times reported in March. That’s after
a program designed to boost women’s selection for boards, instituted last year,
garnered little support from companies.
Viviane Reding, vice president of the European Commission, has been pushing
for EU-wide quotas. She noted in a March press release that in 2010, the EU’s
largest public companies had women represented on boards just 12% of the time.
She is also urging companies to sign a “Women on the Board Pledge for Europe,”
which commits them to have a board made up of 30% women in 2015 and 40% in
2020.
“It confirms what I always believe about change: that it goes from the
‘unthinkable’ (quotas are unthinkable) to the ‘impossible’ (not in our country)
to the ‘inevitable’ (the sky does not fall and actually quotas turn out to be a
good thing),” Liswood said in an email to The Wall Street Journal.
On the other hand, there are a lot of people – including women – who are
firmly opposed to enforcing gender quotas on corporate boards or don’t think
quotas will get the job done.
I am solidly behind this
initiative.
Source: Wall Street Journal
Finance & Investments
Over the
years, the phrase "emerging market" has become all but meaningless.
No group that includes China, Argentina, Kenya, the Philippines, and Romania
can possibly qualify as a single coherent class.
To pick
the likeliest winners in this vast category, Jim O'Neill of Goldman Sachs has
given us the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and now South Africa), the
"Next 11" (Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Mexico, Nigeria,
Pakistan, the Philippines, Turkey, South Korea, and Vietnam) and, more
recently, MIST (Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea, and Turkey). Robert Ward of the
Economist Intelligence Unit has added the CIVETS (Colombia, Indonesia, Vietnam,
Egypt, Turkey, and South Africa.)
But all
these constructions include a dizzyingly diverse set of economies that don't
have much in common.
We live in a crisis-prone age.
The countries that are best positioned to
prosper are those that are resilient as well as strong. That's why
pivot states, those able to build profitable relationships with multiple
partners without becoming overly reliant on any of them, are the likeliest
winners in the G-Zero era.
Brazil
will continue to enjoy excellent trade ties with the United States. But China
is now its largest trade partner, helping Brazil's economy ride out the U.S.
slowdown with minimal damage. NATO membership gives Turkey lasting influence in
Brussels and Washington, and many in the Arab world look to Turkey as a
dynamic, modern Muslim state. Add its position at the crossroads of Europe,
Central Asia, the Middle East, and the former Soviet Union, and Turkey has a
range of political and commercial options. As in Brazil, this advantage helps
absorb the sorts of shocks that are now all too commonplace.
Asia is
home to several pivot states. Indonesia, with nearly 240 million people, enjoys
a well-diversified economy with trade ties balanced among China, the United
States, Japan, and Singapore. Vietnam receives most of its aid from Japan, its
arms from Russia, and its tourists from China; its biggest export market is the
United States.
Not all
pivot states are developing countries. Far-sighted policy ensures that Canada
is now less vulnerable to a slowdown in the United States. The percentage of
Canada's exports to countries other than the U.S. jumped from 18% in 2005 to
more than 25% just four years later.
The
likeliest losers in this more volatile world are shadow states, the opposite of
pivots, those whose political and commercial possibilities are determined
almost entirely by a single powerful partner. Mexico's largest sources of
foreign currency are oil sales, tourism, and remittances from nationals working
abroad. In all three cases, the vast majority of that currency comes from the
United States.
Mexico's
domestic- and foreign-policy choices are determined by its political process,
not the demands of a domineering sponsor. But when compared with Canada,
Mexico's commercial opportunities and the speed of its development are largely
defined by conditions inside one foreign country.
Ukraine, another shadow state, wants to escape Russia's gravitational pull and become a pivot state, preserving relations with Moscow while building new ties with Europe. In fact, Kyiv wants to ink a free-trade deal with the European Union. But Russia has threatened to sharply increase the price of natural gas shipments to Ukraine and throw up new trade barriers if Kyiv moves forward with Europe. The EU, for its part, will end trade talks with Ukraine if it joins a customs union with Russia. Ukraine can't win because it can't pivot. It lacks the strength and independence to improve its bargaining position with either side.
Ukraine, another shadow state, wants to escape Russia's gravitational pull and become a pivot state, preserving relations with Moscow while building new ties with Europe. In fact, Kyiv wants to ink a free-trade deal with the European Union. But Russia has threatened to sharply increase the price of natural gas shipments to Ukraine and throw up new trade barriers if Kyiv moves forward with Europe. The EU, for its part, will end trade talks with Ukraine if it joins a customs union with Russia. Ukraine can't win because it can't pivot. It lacks the strength and independence to improve its bargaining position with either side.
Source: Harvard Business Review
Why?
Why have I bothered dieting?
Latest study in the NY Times tells me that the low fat carbohydrate-rich diet
will not keep me thin (wondered what was wrong!). In fact the study debunks the
old calorie in calorie out myth telling us that the fewer carbohydrates we eat
the more easily we remain lean. The more carbohydrates, the more difficult. In
other words carbohydrates are fattening. What matters, then, is the quantity
and quality of carbohydrates we consume.
From this perspective the trial
suggests that among the bad decisions we can make to maintain our weight is
exactly what the government and medical organisations have been telling us to
do: eat low fat, carbohydrate-rich diets, even if those diets include whole
grains, fruits and vegetables.